Supreme Court protects First Amendment rights
(June 30, official Washington Examiner editorial) When the First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech, it also guarantees the freedom to be silent. Speech that is compelled is not free. That should […]
-
-
Supreme Court endorses racialist gerrymandering
(Official Washington Examiner editorial, June 11) Chief Justice John Roberts famously wrote in a 2006 political redistricting case that “it is a sordid business, this divvying us up by race.” In a […]
-
Government abuse of power, times five
FBI director Chris Wray acts like Biden’s ‘made man’ (May 11): Another day, another high-handed, leftist-protecting, corruption-enabling action by FBI Director Christopher Wray. On May 10, Wray refused to comply […]
-
A Supreme Court threesome
Roberts should testify — later (April 20): Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-IL) has good reasons to invite Chief Justice John Roberts to testify about Supreme Court ethics reform. […]
-
Supreme Court should rein in abusive IRS
(March 24) The Supreme Court hears a case on March 29 that will test whether there is any real limit to the frighteningly invasive power of the IRS . In Polselli v. IRS, the high court […]
-
Sotomayor understands Thomas, but media doesn’t get it
(Oct. 21) Pundits are marveling on Friday about liberal Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor praising the personal decency of conservative colleague Clarence Thomas , but what’s really amiss is the pundits’ own assumptions. Political views […]
-
A two-fer on why Bama redistricting really is okay
The Supreme Court should not make a twisted hodge-podge of redistricting law even worse by throwing out Alabama’s congressional map. Two pieces below explain why. (Links to full columns embedded […]
-
A Fabulous Five (one rather Earthy)
Five columns from the Washington Examiner, with links to full columns embedded in each headline. Alabama’s Katie Britt will be an upbeat new senator (Sept. 28) NASA may just save […]
-
Six takes on the Supreme Court
In these six pieces related to the Supreme Court, the link to the full column is embedded in each headline. Why won’t AG Merrick Garland protect Supreme Court justices? (July […]
-
The OTHER big Supreme Court ruling was unanimous
(Official Washington Examiner editorial, May 3) A unanimous Supreme Court on Monday again made clear that government may not act with hostility against religion. This bears repeating because so many leftist ideologues and willfully […]
