(Sept. 28) Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) is being roundly pilloried for getting nothing in return for enabling his party leaders to enact a budget-busting, IRS-unleashing monster of a leftist budget law. He deserves the scornful treatment.

After more than a year of insisting that adding massive government spending would be inflationary and that new taxes and regulations on fossil fuels would be grossly counterproductive, he made a deal with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) to push through a bill with massive spending and new burdens on fossil fuels. In return, all he received was a vague pledge for energy-developing “permitting reform” that, in theory, Republicans also supported. Emphasis on “vague.”

[kpolls]

The first rule of common sense that Manchin violated is that one should not give up something big now for a mere promise of future action. The second rule is that if you break the first rule, get the promise in writing, and make it specific. The third rule is to make sure that the people on your perceived side of the promissory note (in this case, Republicans supporting permitting reform) actually like the specific details of the reforms you propose. The fourth rule is that the cause you are trying to help must actually be more helped than harmed by those specifics.

And the fifth rule is never to trust Schumer.

Manchin violated every single rule.

He (1) allowed big spending and taxes merely for a promise. The promise was (2) not specific and not in writing but vague. The eventual details, even on the alleged win for his side, as they emerged, were (3) hardly satisfactory to Republicans, because, as the Wall Street Journal explained at length, they would in many ways (4) worsen the situation for the fossil fuel industry everywhere but West Virginia.

And Manchin already had plenty of reason to distrust Schumer….

[To see what the connection is between all this and Simon & Garfunkel, please follow this link. It’s fun. Try it.]

 

Tags: , , , ,